Animation Source Forums

Doesn't she do that with Charlie though? I think we just discovered Sasha's true mate! XD

Er... Sasha din't really seem Mary-Sue to me I mean want did you want her to do exactly? Tell Charlie: Thanks for the bag now get out my life creep? Do you like girls who aren't nice?Hmm if you think that "Count Me Out" scene was a bit too much for kids look it up on you yube and read the comments there, not pleasant. If someone went out of their way to do something nice for me, I'd at least thank them-granted,Charlie was a bit-er more like a lot, "Love Struck"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4POxT7dgpE4,but hey watch all the other dogs in this scenehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOywt8FGurQ DROOLING OVER HER.

As for the bone, that was probably to show she wasn't er... well you know, when a kid saw her give the bone away it was meant to show something called sharing, a kid is probably not gonna stand up and say,"Ooh, mommy, look that bone won't feed the doggie!"

That was probably put there to show she wasn't a "bad girl"-though I kinda like her that way.

Then you might want to look at...well, pretty much any other female character who's pretty much a woman's rights activist. Every anime has a girl that "doesn't like a guy AT FIRST" if I listed them all, wellllll we'd be here a while. As a matter of fact, Sasha is pretty much a "loose" Jenna, considering how Jenna didn't much approve of Steele hitting on her, which was exactly what Charlie was doing. As a matter of fact, Charlie did it more than Steele xD



Yea, actually, if she would've stuck to her guns, it would've made her more interesting.



It wasn't too much at all. Furries just find everything with a tail attractive. However, it was very misleading on her part, which was another thing with her that I don't agree with. Not because she does it, but for the fact that she was leading everyone on with her nonverbal communication, but what she was saying what the complete opposite. If she would've either stuck to either really wanting a "male companion" or completely rejecting the idea of having one altogether, it would've made her a better-built character.



What if that someone kept making sexual advances on you for the rest of the day? Or at the very least kept bugging you about having a boyfriend (Look up "Can I Have Your Number" on youtube and you'll see exactly what I mean)

Love Struck? As if. At least the other dogs kept their hands to themselves, Charlie kept leaping at her trying to kiss her. Imagine how terrible that would've been if he was flesh and blood as opposed to being a ghost. It would've pretty much been some guy trying to make out with a woman singing on stage.



After seeing Sasha singing and teasing boys on stage, kids are supposed to look at her as a role model? O_o



As a kid, I actually did have a problem with that.



Um, wouldn't her taking care of David shown the exact same thing? xDDD

Okay maybe,but I don't really think she's that much like Jenna

Stuck to her guns?*no comment on that*

I think she was just flirting to help her win the contest, really, I mean she didn't seem interested in the dog that tried hitting on her before Charlie did. In fact, she was in a rush to go and take care of David.

Point made there though, that would be terrible,but if Charlie already knew he wasn't tangible, I'm not so sure he would have done that. Knida sad to see his character change though.Other dogs, well they may not have touched her, but just by reading their movements I could tell what they were thinking.

The bone? Well yeah she's no role model,but look at all the other err... well women out there. I'd certainly rather look up to her than some of them. And I'd probably give something as worthless as the bone away too if I was her. She was trying to get food for David,not herself.


and again with the bone now I think it was given away just because she didn't need it.

Bloody good points you made there though.Girls bug boys too,check put "Don't trust me"by 303h.Not exactly what I'd call a good clean song.

I would say the same thing that UK-Ban Cat said, Charlie's great love whould be ambition & greed. But I whould say that you should have a girlfriend come in to be a turning point in Charlie's point of view of love.

Then you can put Charlie in a spot where he has to pick what path he will go down, a path that's for himself or one that's sentimental for others.

Flo (who I think is a family member) shows that she can bring that out, but with Flo it's not a stranger's love, it's someone who already has full knowledge of Charlie and it's more of a brother & sister vibe with them.

Sasha is the type that brings up the flaws of Charlie, but at times she whould miss moments to point out others. She also shows that she whould let Charlie in her life, but only if Charlie whould take the time to figer that out and let her into his...so there is that understanding between the two.

So I go with Sasha.

Not that I'm siding with Flo, but just because Charlie was an "uncle figure" to the pups, doesn't mean he and Flo had a brother/sister relationship. One could say so, if she didn't slide in ever so slowly like she's ready to kiss him (before the fat pup bit his leg). One could say so, also if she didn't bring up "how these little guys loved him". A woman with kids pretty much only says that to a man she truly desires the companionship of, and figures "Well, if he won't be with me for me, he'll be with me for the kids."

I would definatley have to go with Sasha, I get the impression Flo might be his sister the puppies do call him Uncle Charlie.

Read to add the the discussion, YO. Besides. NONE of those pups were the same breed. They can't all be related to Flo and Charlie by blood. Flo was a collie and Charlie was part collie, part retriever, part german shepherd, park great dane. Some puppies in there were like... spaniels and blood hounds >>

Not to take sides, but I don't see where it says that the pups where related to either of them by blood in those comments, Cat.
It does happen with more than people that an animal will take in young that's not theirs by blood (or even species).

Of,course,just because they call him "uncle" doesn't mean they're related by blood.

Sasha for sure! I haven't thought about a love relationship between Flo and Charlie before...i just thought they were just old friends.

I like to think Charlie probly had something going on with Flo at some point, but they grew apart. But I prefer Charlie and Sasha.

At first, I would've favored Sasha, but after reading some of these posts, I'm not so sure. Either one would be great for Charlie.

Ok.. In my opinion.. ADGTH 2 was just.. terribly one sided ended falling into the stereotypical happy.. go lucky..I mean I think I can agree with Cat partially that specifically they made and pushed Sasha's good side a bit tooo hard in the movie and the ending and timing between the two as they pair up in the end is rather over drastic, though If there was an alternate ending.. I can vouch Sasha would have been a better pair up to Charlie then Flo. Why? because the attitude Sasha Actually has is properly and more frequently shown through out the series and if they ended up pairing up afterwards it would make more sense plus the amount of dramatic effect would have been stronger as well as logically "Oh he earned his love from her back". So instead of Sasha leaving off with Charlie and her becoming, I suppose married.. They should have left it off with Sasha saying that she'd give Charlie another chance.. plus the series wouldn't be so abrupt then.