Simba looks the same in all three pics

lighting and shading

in the timon and Pumbaa series he looked like crap

simba would look different. in the first movie he was
younger so he was obviously skinnier and his mane wasn't as
big. in the second he was bigger because he was older and
probably ate meat again rather than bugs. his mane was
bigger too because he was older and probably looked more
well-groomed because he felt he needed to clean XD but as
for the colouring, the animators probably didn't have the
exact colours.
i have to say though. in the second
movie, simba's face looked squished in some scenes.
and in lion king 1 1/3 (3) whoever was animating it
really screwed up on adult simba's design. he looked rather
ugly if you ask me. (especially nala when she was telling
timon and pumbaa about scar)

I get what you're saying about the colouring, but in all
three there is different lighting so it makes sense for them
to be different. though i'm pretty sure the colouring
changes anyway

Kimba's right. His face,well whole body is
CHUNKY!!

There is a difference.

Good eyes.

Actually, i can't find a difference... But for the mane
thing, i'll do some research... hopefully i can get some
info on the effects of aging in lion manes...

i have two theories...1) he was aging...i mean cmon he went through alot...2) he couldve matured alot more since lion king...and i agree with simbaguard that it amkes sense that he looks the same in lion king and lion king 1 1/2...

He doesn't looks fat in the 2nd movie. But, like SimbasGaurd said, well feed.

what bloopers?

did anyone find bloopers??

maybe a lion's colour changes with age? I dont know, animation can't be identicle to the original.

I know he was older.. but i'm talking about the coloring.

He looks diferent in lion king two cause he's older, his mane has grown longer as well. I thought in Lion king 1 1/2 they used the same clips from lion king one, cause that bit where simba took the thorn out of Nala's paw he looked way different then in the pic you used, which is just a clip they took from lion king one. does that make sense?

hi know he wasn't the same size but i was talking about the coloring. Simba is supposed to be big because he had to be a full grown lion to be a farther,like mufasa.

Hello Rohad's succecesor(Aride) To Kimba: I'd say Simba looks well fed not fat. Simbe looks like a very solidly built, Powerful Lion. At the end of Lion King 1 Simba is not full grown. Plus going back to eating meat insted of bugs is sure to make Him enjoy His meals a bit more so between becoming a full grown Adult Lion, And some better food Simba's weight gane makes sence to Me.

omg simbas gaurd has been here!

I noticed that too, but it wasn't just his coloring that changed, his weight did too! did you notice in the first one, he was thin, but in the 2nd one he was fat?

I noticed that too, but it wasn't just his coloring that changed, his weight did too! did you notice in the first one, he was thin, but in the 2nd one he was fat?

Lion Kink 1 1/2(3)takes place durring Lion King 1 so It makes sence that He looks The same in both movies.

thanks. sersioudly?

the last one is due to different lighting. but good eyes