Kit and Molly.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:10 pm

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Dragon Tamer wrote:

steet wrote:

Mmm...I'd say they're so young, they will develop a "brother and sister" relationship. So I really don't see them getting together when growing up, it'd be...awkward.

The same could be said of Simba and Nala. In fact I'm pretty sure it was.

That's what I was think! I just oftern forget too write thing I might otherwise say.

I know what you mean. I look back and go, "I should have said this and this and this" all the time.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:25 pm

That's what I was think! I just oftern forget too write thing I might otherwise say.[/quote]
I know what you mean. I look back and go, "I should have said this and this and this" all the time.[/quote]

Yeah and I should'ive remembered, but that's me for you. But I could see them after not being together for awhile and she is this beautyful 17-18 year old and him this ruggard guy in his early 20's and they would be drawn too each other in a different way.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:40 pm

[

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

quote="Dragon Tamer"]

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

That's what I was think! I just oftern forget too write thing I might otherwise say.

I know what you mean. I look back and go, "I should have said this and this and this" all the time.

Yeah and I should'ive remembered, but that's me for you. But I could see them after not being together for awhile and she is this beautyful 17-18 year old and him this ruggard guy in his early 20's and they would be drawn too each other in a different way.[/quote]
They'd probably find themselves having to wait a few more years to pursue a romantic relationship in that case, much as J.R.R. Tolkein did with the woman he eventually married (although in their case, she was the older one).

A six-year gap would, I concede, complicate things more than the two or four year gap I imagined them to have. Still not insurmountable.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:17 am

Quote:

They'd probably find themselves having to wait a few more years to pursue a romantic relationship in that case, much as J.R.R. Tolkein did with the woman he eventually married (although in their case, she was the older one).

Maybe but at that time things were different and she is quite mature in many ways.

Quote:

A six-year gap would, I concede, complicate things more than the two or four year gap I imagined them to have. Still not insurmountable.[/quote]

Not in the 1940's! Heck the women my dad is with is half his age!.. I admit I'm not impressed as her dad is younger them him.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:19 am

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Maybe but at that time things were different and she is quite mature in many ways.

I'm not sure I agree with your assessment of her. Granted she showed herself to be a good judge of character, but she wasn't what I would call "mature."

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Not in the 1940's! Heck the women my dad is with is half his age!.. I admit I'm not impressed as her dad is younger them him.

In all brutal honesty, that is BEYOND disturbing. Besides, the fact that something is done does not by any means make it okay. And I'm fairly certain Talespin was not produced in the 40s, so I'm not too clear on what you're talking about there.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:51 am

Quote:

I'm not sure I agree with your assessment of her. Granted she showed herself to be a good judge of character, but she wasn't what I would call "mature."

In her ablity too comprhend some stuff she is... like love. But yoe she is a wild little girl.

Quote:

In all brutal honesty, that is BEYOND disturbing. Besides, the fact that something is done does not by any means make it okay. And I'm fairly certain Talespin was not produced in the 40s, so I'm not too clear on what you're talking about there.[/quote]

I never said it was ok (I nearly throttled him). I ment the series is set in the 30's and by the age I'm talking of it'll be the late 40's.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:18 am

Quote:

In her ablity too comprhend some stuff she is... like love. But yoe she is a wild little girl.

Care to elaborate?

Quote:

I ment the series is set in the 30's and by the age I'm talking of it'll be the late 40's.

I'd have to check, but I think back then people were a good deal more conservative about relationships, and more power to them, I say.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:19 am

[quote="Dragon Tamer"In her ablity too comprhend some stuff she is... like love. But yoe she is a wild little girl.[/quote]

Quote:

Care to elaborate?

She can understand some stuff well, like Covention was not in love with Becky but useing her.

I ment the series is set in the 30's and by the age I'm talking of it'll be the late 40's.[/quote]

Quote:

I'd have to check, but I think back then people were a good deal more conservative about relationships, and more power to them, I say.[/quote]

Oh they were! And back then getting a good young man just after high school was kind of a good investment.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:29 am

Well, it's not that unusual, especially in entertainment, for children to automatically distrust anyone who isn't their dad and takes a romantic interest in their mom, or who isn't their mom and takes a romantic interest in their dad (see such examples as David in All Dogs go to Heaven 2 or the kids in The Spy Next Door. It is a mindset, essentially, of "You're not my daddy, so stop shoving into his spot!"

Also, I'm not sure we're looking at the same definition of being conservative about relationships. It sounds more like you're thinking of pragmatic, and although pragmatic and conservative can and often do go hand-in-hand, they are two different things.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:12 am

Dragon Tamer wrote:

Well, it's not that unusual, especially in entertainment, for children to automatically distrust anyone who isn't their dad and takes a romantic interest in their mom, or who isn't their mom and takes a romantic interest in their dad (see such examples as David in All Dogs go to Heaven 2 or the kids in The Spy Next Door. It is a mindset, essentially, of "You're not my daddy, so stop shoving into his spot!"

Yeah, but she also knew something else was afoot.

Also, I'm not sure we're looking at the same definition of being conservative about relationships. It sounds more like you're thinking of pragmatic, and although pragmatic and conservative can and often do go hand-in-hand, they are two different things.

Maybe, I don't like too make terms like that, although by nature and culture I am somewhat pragmatic. Heck libral can also fit in as well but I don't like any of those terms as they create a barrier.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:43 pm

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Dragon Tamer wrote:

Well, it's not that unusual, especially in entertainment, for children to automatically distrust anyone who isn't their dad and takes a romantic interest in their mom, or who isn't their mom and takes a romantic interest in their dad (see such examples as David in All Dogs go to Heaven 2 or the kids in The Spy Next Door. It is a mindset, essentially, of "You're not my daddy, so stop shoving into his spot!"

Yeah, but she also knew something else was afoot.

Also, I'm not sure we're looking at the same definition of being conservative about relationships. It sounds more like you're thinking of pragmatic, and although pragmatic and conservative can and often do go hand-in-hand, they are two different things.

Maybe, I don't like too make terms like that, although by nature and culture I am somewhat pragmatic. Heck libral can also fit in as well but I don't like any of those terms as they create a barrier.

Good point; I don't like being pigeonholed myself.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:45 pm

Good point; I don't like being pigeonholed myself.[/quote]

Yeah, I just ment in the end that one thing let to another. And it doesn't have to just be romance.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:16 pm

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Yeah, I just ment in the end that one thing let to another. And it doesn't have to just be romance.

Gotcha.

TheGroundedAviator · **Posted:** Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:44 am

Dragon Tamer wrote:

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Yeah, I just ment in the end that one thing let to another. And it doesn't have to just be romance.

Gotcha.

Though I may sound as one sided it's usually as I'm thinking/talking that way too understand it as I find one side easy too understand the the other not so, or it's more complex.
And it need not involve fictional love.

Dragon Tamer · **Posted:** Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:39 pm

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Dragon Tamer wrote:

TheGroundedAviator wrote:

Yeah, I just ment in the end that one thing let to another. And it doesn't have to just be romance.

Gotcha.

Though I may sound as one sided it's usually as I'm thinking/talking that way too understand it as I find one side easy too understand the the other not so, or it's more complex.
And it need not involve fictional love.

So basically you intend to go with whatever is easiest to understand?

Animation Source Forums

Kit and Molly.

Who is online